Category: Writers Block
Either SO OFTEN or SO FREQUENT (or are they BOTH the same?), we're caught up into this crazy scene of ALL SORTS--things that we hear, whether it's word-of-mouth, through the media, etc., that may leave one to either WONDER OR ASSUME, provided with ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE of who/whatever the ORIGIN of who/whatever SOURCE, from where/whom SUCH INFORMATION/PREDICTION/WHATEVER/ALL-ABOVE ORIGINATED. Now, where ANY/ALL OF THIS COULD BE LEADING TO, IS THE CLEAR FACT that one such COMMON PRACTICE that WE, AS FLAWFUL AS ALL HUMANS ARE, is to "ASSUME."
Over the years, WHOEVER'S CLEVER IDEA to break "ASSUME" down into an EXTREME, DIRECT HARD-HITTER DEFINITELY had the VERY RIGHT IDEA, thanks to leaving such open for PERHAPS COUNTLESS VARIATIONS--MY version, unless there might be OTHERS that are familiar with the same version, is "when you ASSUME, the ""ASS" is ""U," instead of ""ME,"" which I THINK I already said in ANOTHER board post, if I'm not mistaken.
Ok, being that we're SLIGHTLY straying from the MAIN TOPIC, although "ASSUME" STILL has SOMEWHAT a connection to this, to cite a TYPICAL EXAMPLE of "BELIEVABLE" and "TRUE," BLINDNESS is BELIEVED to be "A HANDICAP." Although such claim COULD BE, which it often IS, by those of the "IGNORANT FACTION," BELIEVABLE, THOSE OF US that DEFIITELY KNOW BETTER, know that SUCH BELIEVABLE CLAIM is ABSOLUTELY FALSE.
ANOTHER EXAMPLE: the fact that GOD EXISTS is "NON-BELIEVABLE" to an ATHEIST; NON-BELIEVABLE, though such BIBLICALLY-CLEAR FACT MAY BE, NEVER HAS, DOES, OR WILL DIMINISH, as far as IMPACT is concerned--NO, I'm NOT PREACHING, so GET OVER IT!
ANOTHER (FAVORITE OF MINE) EXAMPLE: the fact that my ZONE user-name, ACCORDING TO THOSE that BELIEVABLY PREDICT that such defines "my fate (HERE'S where ANY of the "ASSUME" variations come in)," COULD BE BELIEVABLE, NEVER TO ALL, WORLDWIDE, of course, AND FURTHERMORE BELIEVABLE to NEVER CHANGE in favor of what I desire, COULD NEVER MEASURE AGAINST GOD'S FINAL DECISION, in such favor as mine, SHOULD IT EVER BE SO.
Having said ALL THE ABOVE, I got JUST ONE--well, MAYBE MORE THAN ONE--QUESTION: why do we WASTE PRECIOUS TIME, bothering to PROOVE OURSELVES, AND/OR OTHERS, to the opposition, when we SHOULD know, GOOD AND DAMN WELL, that ANY/ALL THAT'S BELIEVED by the opposition WITHOUT ANY OUNCE OF EVIDENCE, as COUNTER-POSITIONED to ANY/ALL FACT/FACTS that's SELF-PROOVEN, don't even have ONE LEG TO STAND ON, no matter HOW BELIEVABLE THEY COULD BE, AND MIGHT ALWAYS REMAIN?
NOW, I don't ALWAYS condone or condemn lying, but MY ADVICE is that if you're GONNA lie, for whatever cause, MAKE YOUR LIE BELIEVABLE! For example: if you're making money under the table, living in the U.S., as a citizen, and the Government doesn't know it, and ANYONE should CASUALLY ask if whether or not you DO work, a simple "NO," and NO MORE THAN THAT will do JUST FINE--after all, even though YOURS was a one-worded RESPONSE, and as long as you didn't sign your "JOHN HANCOCK (signature)" to ANYTHING, REGARDLESS, and you DIDN'T put your STASH OF CASH, in which, you're to ONLY be paid, into ANY BANK ACCOUNT, WHATSOEVER, though you DID lie, it was BELIEVABLE.